A Dolls House Jungian Analysis - Literature Essay Samples

In Ibsens A Dolls House, the path to self-realization and transformation is depicted by the main character, Nora Helmer. She is a woman constrained by both her husbands domineering ways as well as her own. From a Jungian perspective, Noras lack of a developed contrasexual force, or animus, is the stumbling block to her achieving personal freedom. The author achieves this by creating in Nora the archetype of transformation, which allows her to change from a child-like object belonging to her husband Torvald Helmer, into an independently thinking, self-realized woman.The outset of the story characterizes Nora as a childish plaything who is controlled by her husband. From a Jungian perspective, her persona points to the lack of balance of her animus. One indication of this is the way Nora tries to persuade Torvald to do something she wants. NORA: Your squirrel would scamper about and do tricks, if youd only be sweet and give in (Ibsen 196). Nora doesnt feel she can be upfront wi th Torvald, so she relies on silly and flirtatious methods of persuasion. This behavior is prevalent during most of the play. In fairness though, Torvald refers to his wife in childlike ways. Nora is merely responding to his views of her as a pretty little object. HELMER: Now, now, the little larks wings mustnt droop. Come on, dont be a sulky squirrel (Ibsen 172). It is this circle of belittlement and control that is fostering within Nora the inhibition of her animus. According to Jung, the animus is the corresponding representative of the masculine contrasexual elements in the psychology of women (Edinger 4 of 9). That is to say, it is the animus that represents the masculinity in a woman. For Nora to be able to pull away from her husband, or her family, she would first need to focus her contrasexual energies. However, this would be difficult for Nora to achieve due to numerous reasons, one of which involves the past. As author Cheryl Jarvis points out, Historically, ou r culture has suppressed what we once called male characteristics (power and independence) in women (Jarvis 4 of 6). In other words, the historical restrictions placed on male/female characteristics helps contribute to the shortage of contrasexual energies. It is with this in mind that one can understand some of the reasons for Noras persona. The persona is the partially calculated public face an individual assumes towards others. The persona is composed of various elements, some based on the individuals personal propensities and others derived from the societys expectations and the early training of parents and teachers (Edinger 3 of 9). That is, the persona of an individual is the face they show in public. Given that its developed by many means, one including the early training of parents, it is clear that Nora, from an early age, would be at a disadvantage in the development of her animus. A clear example of this is in the way she speaks about her fathers method of raising her. NORA: When I lived at home with Papa, he told me all his opinions, so I had the same ones too; or if they were different I hid them, since he wouldnt have cared for that. He used to call me his doll-child, and he played with me the way I played with my dolls (Ibsen 220). Her antics and undeveloped sense of power and independence stem from her fathers treatment of her as an unthinking child. Noras life is a continuation of the circle of belittlement and control her father began implementing at an early age, except this time it is with Torvald. However, as Ibsen proves with the character of Mrs. Linde, Noras chance for transformation and self-realization is not at all impossible.Mrs. Linde can be seen as an ideally transformed and contrasexually developed woman. Ibsen provides in her a glimpse into the possible future of Noras personal maturity. A good example of this is when Mrs. Linde speaks to Nora about relationships and Noras childlike behavior. MRS. LINDE: Now l isten, Nora; in many ways youre still like a child. Im a good deal older than you, with a little more experience (Ibsen 194). Ibsen gives Mrs. Linde a sense of maturity and experience by having her state that she is older and implying that she is wiser. As Jarvis states regarding the need for contrasexual development, The task of the second half of life, said Jung, is to claim our contrasexual energies in other words, to find our missing selves (Jarvis 4 of 6). The second half of life involves ones search for his or her contrasexual force. The cultivation and balance of a persons animus thus becomes one of the focal points of midlife. Ibsen further illustrates Jarvis point when Mrs. Linde speaks to Krogstad about her personal change. MRS. LINDE: Ive learned to be realistic. Life and hard, bitter necessity have taught me that (Ibsen 210). It is apparent that she has had a hard life, from which she has learned to be an independent thinker and has achieved self-realization. With her wisdom, she sees the need for Nora to be honest about her predicament. Being mature, experienced, and perceptive allows her to see accurately the problems the couple has. This is made clear when she is again speaking to Krogstad regarding the letter he has dropped into Torvalds mailbox. MRS. LINDE: Yes, in that first panic. But its been a whole day and night since then, and in that time Ive seen such things in this house. Helmers got to learn everything; this dreadful secret has to be aired; those two have to come to full understanding; all these lies and evasions cant go on (Ibsen 211). Mrs. Linde observes the need for Nora to be honest with Torvald, even if the marriage might suffer irreparable damage. She sees that the Helmer household is a nursery for hypocrisy and repression, possessiveness and lies (Thompson 2 of 5). Besides the visible aspects of Noras marriage, she is made aware of Thompsons viewpoint by the things Nora reveals about her relationship to Torvald. NORA: You see, Torvald loves me beyond words, and, as he puts it, hed like to keep me all to himself (Ibsen 194). Nora, unknowingly, makes obvious to Mrs. Linde such things as the possessive nature of Torvald. Through her attained self-realization and contrasexual development, she provides Nora with an example of what can become of a woman who changes her persona and attempts to find her missing self. This is achieved through the advice she gives to Nora as well as the examples of financial independence she provides. Case in point, MRS. LINDE: Yes, so I had to scrape up a living with a little shop and a little teaching and whatever else I could find. The last three years have been like one endless workday without rest for me (Ibsen 177). Mrs. Lindes description of self-support and independence gives Nora a living example of achieved self-realization, one that is worthy of emulation.The last act of the play depicts Noras transformation. From a Jungian perspective, the breaking away from Torvald proves that she has begun to develop her masculine side. Ibsen, from the beginning, created in Nora the archetype of transformation, which pertains to a psychic process of growth, change, and transition. It can express itself in many different images with the same underlying core of meaning The theme of death and rebirth as well (Edinger 6 of 9). This archetype applies to individuals who change, or mature, mentally. In A Dolls House, Ibsen expresses the image of change and transition with Nora. During most of the play, she is aware of her limitations in her role as wife and she consciously plays the part of Torvalds pet. However, this changes in the last act. Nora finally confronts her husband and allows herself to reveal her innermost feelings regarding her role as his wife. NORA: I dont believe in that any more. I believe that, before all else, Im a human being, no less than you or anyway, I ought to try to become one. I know the majorit y thinks youre right, Torvald, and plenty of books agree with you too. But I cant go on believing what the majority says, or whats written in books. I have to think over these things myself and try to understand them (Ibsen 222). Nora, for the first time in her life, has revealed openly and with confidence a personal need. She tells Torvald that she no longer believes in the traditional views society holds of marriage. Most important though, is her newfound need to think things through for herself. Nora further depicts this when she responds to Torvalds claim of her being childlike and naive. NORA: .But now Ill begin to learn for myself. Ill try to discover whos right, the world or I (Ibsen 222). Admitting that she is indeed inexperienced with the ways of the world, she is nevertheless willing to begin being an independent woman. The need to become self-realized has come to fruition. To become wholewomen who need to develop their masculine traits are pulled outward, away from home and family life (Jarvis 4 of 6). As Nora begins to realize the stifling nature of her marriage and her husbands lack of self-sacrifice, she sees the need to pull away from him. NORA: Good. Well, now its all over. Im putting the keys here. The maids know all about keeping up the house better than I do. Tomorrow, after Ive left town, Kristine will stop by to pack up everything thats mine from home. Id like those things shipped up to me (Ibsen 224). Noras decisiveness regarding the choice to leave Torvald is made clear and her contrasexual energy is beginning to show. From a Jungian point of view, Noras path to self-realization and transformation begins to take shape with her final resolve to separate herself from Torvald. Since the theme of death and rebirth are expressions of the archetype of transformation, the death of Noras marriage allows her transformation to begin taking shape. She is beginning to develop her masculine side by taking charge of her life a nd thinking for herself. No longer is she a mere doll.In the end, a Jungian analysis of A Dolls House gives insight into Noras character and shares Ibsens view of the importance of personal development and acquired independence. The main character starts off as a childish girl who succumbs to her husbands demands and behaves as if unable to think for herself. However, Ibsen shows that underneath Noras surface is a woman screaming to be free. Although naive, she is not completely silly, but rather uses that persona to fill a role she feels is demanded of her. This would not be the case if her sense of contrasexual prowess, stemming from her animus, had been effectively developed. But, as Jung defined with the archetype of transformation and Ibsen illustrated with Noras beginnings of self-realization, the psychic process of change takes time, effort, and often a revelatory experience.Works Cited:Edinger, Edward F. An Outline of Analytical Psychology. Quadrant. New York: 1968 .Ibsen, Henrik. A Dolls House. Pocketful of Plays: Vintage Drama. Ed. Christopher P. Klein. Boston: Heinle, 1996. 170-224.Jarvis, Cheryl. The Marriage Sabbatical: The Journey that Brings You Home. New York: Perseus Books, 2000.Thompson, Bruce. Ibsen, The Liberator. 11April. 2001. University of California Santa Cruz. 19 November. 2003

College Life Tips on Relationships with Professors

One doesn’t have to be a rocket scientist to understand that being on good terms with people you depend on is a good idea. However, students are not very keen on trying to strike friendly relations with their professors. Probably due to the difference in age – when you are 18 all people over 25 look like members of a different species with no chance to ever understand you. In truth, striking a friendship with a professor may be much easier than you expect – and useful, as well. 1.  Letters of Recommendation Maintaining friendly relationships with a professor may not bring you immediate results. However, later on, when you seek the admittance to a grad school you will need at least one letter of recommendation from somebody who knows your work and can confirm your qualifications – and a friendly professor interested in your career is just what you need. 2.  Job Experience Never fail to ask a professor you like if he or she needs some help with their research. In addition to taking part in work far beyond the usual scope of college studies and trying yourself at a lot of new things, it will allow you to mention all these projects as job experience in your resume when you start looking for a job. 3.  Opportunities Professors on friendly terms with you know your abilities, strengths and aspirations. Perhaps see their younger selves in you and are pleased by readiness with which you communicate with them. At the same time, they have been moving in their professional circles for a long time, know a lot of people and keep up with the latest trends. If they like you personally, they may advise you to take a particular internship, for example, the one they know will complement your abilities and help your growth – or they will recommend you to a friend who can help you, or do something else to assist you. 4.  Greater Benefits from Studies Students maintaining good relationships with their professors often say that discussions they have with them after classes have done even more for their education than studies proper. When you know the professor as a person, not as a teaching machine, you care more about his or her opinion about you, you are eager to learn more from him/her, and in the end – you get more out of the course as well. 5.  Mentoring Having a friend who is older and more experienced in the ways of the world than the majority of your acquaintances can be extremely helpful, especially when you are at the beginning of your career path – or haven’t yet decided what this path is going to be. A mentor capable of changing your life may be very close – and if you find time and courage to socialize with your professors, you may find him or her right now. And, of course, in addition to all these rather pragmatic considerations we shouldn’t forget one more thing. Professors are quite often very interesting and fascinating people – and being friends with them is fun, as simple as that.